<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Cognitive Bias on Abel G. Vidal</title><link>https://abelgvidal.com/tags/cognitive-bias/</link><description>Recent content in Cognitive Bias on Abel G. Vidal</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 20:03:54 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://abelgvidal.com/tags/cognitive-bias/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>You are probably bad in probability</title><link>https://abelgvidal.com/posts/optionalrandom/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 20:03:54 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://abelgvidal.com/posts/optionalrandom/</guid><description>&lt;p>In her book &amp;ldquo;Randomness,&amp;rdquo; Deborah Bennett presents an example that illustrates how bad we are at calculating probabilities, even highly trained professionals. A group of doctors received this question:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>The test of a disease has a 5% false positive rate. The disease affects 1 in 1000 people in the population. People are tested randomly, whether they are suspected to be sick or not. A particular patient&amp;rsquo;s test is positive. What is the probability that this patient actually has the disease?&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>